Facts and insights about Texas public schools

Random header image... Refresh for more!

D.C. Voucher Program Students Perform Worse on Math

Washington, D.C. students who use federally funded vouchers to attend private schools perform significantly worse in math than their public school peers, according to a new federal study.

The study, from the Institute of Education Sciences, found that math scores were 10 percentage points lower for students who used vouchers compared with students who applied for the voucher program but were not selected through the lottery. Voucher students also had lower reading scores, though the difference was not statistically significant.

Read “Study: Students in only federally funded voucher program perform worse on math,” in the Washington Post.

June 6, 2018

Understanding What’s Fueling School Privatization

A new piece in the Washington Post provides a comprehensive look at the history of the movement to privatize U.S. public schools.

The conclusion of the piece notes that entrepreneurs were quick to see school privatization as a way “to tap into vast public resources” but that privatization isn’t living up to the claims of free-market boosters. On the whole, for-profit schools have shown “disappointing academic results, endemic corruption, and growing segregation…”

For-profit schools still have some true believers, even in Congress, which went so far as to ban the evaluation of Washington, D.C.’s voucher program. However, public confidence in those schools is waning.

“Given the overall record of charter schools, support in the general public and among minorities has been slipping. According to the most recent survey conducted by the pro-reform journal Education Next, support among all respondents dropped from 51 percent to 39 percent from 2016 to 2017.

“It turns out that when Americans know that market-based reforms drain funds from public schools, most oppose the policies. The success of the ed reform movement so far has depended on their not knowing.”

Read “What and who is fueling the movement to privatize public education—and why you should care?” in the Washington Post.

June 4, 2018

Fighting ‘Yellowbelly Politicians’ to Save Texas Public Schools

Jimmie Don Aycock, former state representative and public education advocate, is dialing his advocacy up a notch through his involvement in the Texas First Coalition, a nonprofit bringing education advocates and business leaders together with the goal of promoting quality public schools, a thriving business environment, government fiscal responsibility, and stronger ethics for elected officials.

Aycock did an extensive Q&A in the Waco Tribune focused on funding for public schools, the property tax system, the challenges of the current “byzantine” school finance system, and whether state leaders will step up to do the right thing for public school students.

Aycock is of the opinion that some state leaders don’t want to fund public education because their own kids go to private schools. “They just want out of the system and don’t really care what happens to everybody else,” Aycock said.

Read “Fighting ‘yellowbelly politicians’ to save Texas’ public schools: Q&A with Jimmie Don Aycock” in the Waco Tribune.

May 23, 2018

Thomas Ratliff Shares Thoughts on Charter Schools, Vouchers

In the latest TASB Talks podcast, Thomas Ratliff, former member of the State Board of Education and son of former Lieutenant Governor Bill Ratliff, provides a history lesson on the establishment of charter schools in Texas and compares the respective results of charter and public schools. Vouchers are likely to be included in legislation in the 2019 session of the Texas Legislature, so Ratliff weighs in on whether a voucher bill can pass.

Listen to the TASB Talks podcast.

May 18, 2018

Recapture May Thwart Dallas ISD’s Academic Success

A new editorial in the Dallas Morning News notes that Dallas ISD is enjoying academic success, including across-the-board STAAR testing growth. Another source of strength is the district’s strong signature programs: pre-K and innovative choice campuses.

Unfortunately, the district’s financial picture is not as bright. In 2018–19, the district will join Austin and Houston ISDs in sending millions of tax dollars back to the state. Rising property values and declining enrollment have made Dallas ISD a property wealthy district subject to recapture, in spite of 90 percent of its students being poor.

The district would benefit from additional funding to expand initiatives that are clearly working. Instead, it will have to return at least $39 million to the state’s general fund, thanks to the convoluted school funding formula that’s part of our system of school finance. “At a time when Dallas ISD is moving the academic needle for our city’s schoolchildren, it deserves both community and state support for much-needed dollars,” the editorial reads.

Read “As Dallas ISD sees academic progress, Austin’s ‘recapture’ of funds seems especially cruel blow,” in the Dallas Morning News.


May 16, 2018

Showing Appreciation for Teachers

Midland ISD Teacher Chris Hightower’s commentary in the Midland Reporter-Telegram notes that teacher strikes around the nation have demonstrated that teachers are tired of a “business as usual” approach to education funding.

The Texas Legislature is directed by the state Constitution to “provide and fund an efficient system of public schools to provide for the general diffusion of knowledge.” Simply put, schools must be adequately funded. Hightower says school finance “is ridiculously complex” and not focused on providing adequate funding. He notes that fixing education funding in Texas will require a long, hard look at all possible options.

He also reminds readers that they have another option. “If you truly want to show your appreciation for teachers, you should look at changing the week of teacher appreciation from the first week of May to the first week of November. Give educators a gift in the form of supporting measures and candidates at the ballot box,” Hightower writes.

Read “Texas needs more than a Band-Aid approach to fix education,” by Chris Hightower, Midland Reporter-Telegram.

May 14, 2018

No Magic Bullet Will Fix School Funding

In a new commentary featured in TribTalk, former state representative and public education advocate Jimmie Don Aycock noted that Texas’ latest commission to study school finance isn’t likely to come up with a quick fix.

“Amid years of ongoing study, what have we learned? We have learned there are no easy answers and certainly no magic bullets to fix education funding,” Aycock writes. He lists the state’s options:

  • Live with a mediocre education system.
  • Accept very high local property taxes as the state pays less and less of the overall cost of education.
  • Realistically face the need to enhance state revenue.

“As our Commission on Public Education Finance struggles through the summer we wish them well. Most of us believe that accepting mediocrity is not very Texan. But the reality is that, without a discussion about increasing state revenue, their work can only join the myriad of other dust-covered school finance studies that have preceded them,” Aycock writes.

Read “Time for a reality check on public education” by Jimmie Don Aycock in TribTalk.

May 8, 2018

Texas Needs Real Answers on the Cost of Public Education

When asked about the adequacy of education in Texas, state leaders are fond of saying that more than half of the state’s budget (52 percent) is devoted to education.

That statement on its own isn’t very helpful in terms of understanding how much it costs to educate our kids. As a new commentary in the San Antonio Express-News points out, Texas has allocated much more of its total budget to education in the past. In 1998–99, for example, Texas dedicated 61 percent of its budget to education (K–12 and public colleges and universities), according to Politifact Texas. That number has dropped steadily since that time.

Sure, education is the biggest expense in the state budget, but as a percentage of the budget, Texas’ spending on it is at a 20-year low. Leaders also say they have “fully funded” the Foundation School Program, but that’s not the same as ensuring that it the funding provided adequately covers the state’s needs.

Read “Dan Patrick cares about public education, but…” by Josh Brodesky, San Antonio Express-News.

May 3, 2018

Schools Require Maintenance

A commentary by Margaret Nicklas in the Austin American-Statesman notes that recent news stories have focused on the sorry state of some schools across the country. Tattered, outdated textbooks and facilities in disrepair due to a lack of funding are increasingly common.

It is well documented that teachers also pay for classroom materials to engage their students. Parents, in turn, are asked to volunteer their time for fundraisers and chip in to cover other costs. “We pay dearly in property taxes and wonder why more of these costs cannot already be covered by public funds. They should be,” Nicklas writes.

“The answer is not to ask teachers and parents to chip in more. The answer is to collect and equitably distribute the necessary funds across public education systems and fund it like the priority it should be—for all our children. They represent, as we know, our very future, even those who don’t have children of their own,”

Read “Commentary: Schools need good maintenance, like your car and home,” by Margaret Nicklas, special to the Austin American-Statesman.

May 1, 2018

Voucher Proponents Target Military Families, Schools

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is pushing for private school vouchers for military families, in spite of major groups within the military community opposing the proposal.

Voucher proponents are pushing for the inclusion of the Education Savings Accounts for Military Families Act (HR 5199) in must-pass military funding legislation (the National Defense Reauthorization Act), despite opposition from a coalition of more than 25 organizations representing more than 5.5 million active and former members of the U.S. military. The accounts would cover education expenses, including private school tuition.

Funding ($1.3 billion) would come from the Impact Aid program, which funds education programs and schools on federal land exempt from local taxes, including military bases. Military groups oppose the proposal because it would take funding away from the same students it is designed to support. “Using Impact Aid dollars to fund Education Savings Accounts for military-connected students would be financially devastating for many school districts, critically compromising the quality of the education they could provide to military children and their civilian classmates,” the Military Coalition wrote in a letter to Congress earlier this month.

Read “DeVos pushes school vouchers for military families despite opposition,” in The Hill. See the National School Board Association’s Legislative Call-to-Action to learn more about this issue.

April 27, 2018