Facts and insights about Texas public schools

Random header image... Refresh for more!

Ratliff: Public School Performance Beats Charters

Thomas Ratliff, a former member of the State Board of Education and long-time advocate for public schools, recently responded to claims on the part of the Texas Charter School Association that charter schools are “steadily improving.” This claim came after critiques of substandard performance on their part.

Ratliff uses Texas Education Agency Snapshot data to show that charters have a dropout rate 3.5 times higher than ISDs, a much lower four-year graduation rate, fewer students taking college admission tests, lower achievement on college admission tests (with one minor exception), and lower performance on standardized tests. Charter schools also have fewer students in special education, career and technical education, and gifted and talented programs than ISDs (by a lot).

Charter schools spend 51 percent of their funding on instructional expenses, while ISDs spent 57.5 percent. An average of 13 percent of charter school expenditures are for central administration, compared to 6 percent for ISDs.

In spite of the above evidence that charters lag ISDs in terms of performance and spend less on instruction, the Legislature just increased state aid for charter schools by $1.46 billion and decreased state aid for ISDs by $2.6 billion. After 20 years, Ratliff questions how long we have to wait for charter schools to fulfill their promise of “improving student learning.”

Read “How Long Do We Have to Wait” by Thomas Ratliff.

October 9, 2017

2011 Public Ed Funding Cuts Have Consequences

A new report by the Center for Public Policy Priorities (CPPP) details the lasting impact of Texas’ 2011 funding cuts to public education. Some might think Texas public schools have fully recovered from the $5.3 billion cuts, but an analysis of the data shows that they have had lasting negative effects.

“The result was a funding hole, five years long and five billion dollars deep,” CPPP said. “Futhermore, when funding was cut, the effects fell disproportionately on programs serving low-income students.” The state has not yet returned to the prerecession per-student funding level of 2008. Students needing extra support—which costs more to provide—were hit hardest by the cuts.

Read Consequences of the Texas Public School Funding Hole of 2011–16 by Dr. Michael Marder and Chandra King Villanueva.

October 5, 2017

26 Texas Public Schools Earn Blue Ribbon Honors

The U.S. Department of Education recently announced that 26 Texas public schools earned Blue Ribbon honors for 2017. The Texas Education Agency nominates the schools for the honor.

The following Texas Blue Ribbon schools completed a rigorous application process and will receive their awards at the annual Blue Ribbon School conference in Washington, D.C.:

  • Amarillo ISD—Whittier Elementary School
  • Banquete ISD—Banquete Elementary School
  • Birdville ISD—Smithfield Elementary School
  • Dallas ISD—Barack Obama Male Leadership Academy
  • Dallas ISD—Dallas Environmental Science Academy
  • Dallas ISD—Irma Lerma Rangel Women’s Leadership School
  • Edinburg CISD—Austin Elementary School
  • Edinburg CISD—Jefferson Elementary School
  • El Paso ISD—Green Elementary School
  • El Paso ISD—Silva Health Magnet
  • Galveston ISD—Austin Middle School
  • Gunter ISD—Gunter Elementary School
  • Houston ISD—Eastwood Academy
  • Houston ISD—Lyons Elementary School
  • Jim Ned CISD—Lawn Elementary School
  • Judson ISD—Crestview Elementary School
  • KIPP Houston—KIPP Shine Prep
  • La Porte ISD—Jennie Reid Elementary School
  • Laredo ISD—Hector J. Garcia Early College High School
  • Los Fresnos ISD—Rancho Verde Elementary School
  • Montgomery ISD—Montgomery Intermediate School
  • Oakwood ISD—Oakwood Elementary School
  • San Antonio ISD—Travis Early College High School
  • Whitehouse ISD—Stanton-Smith Elementary School
  • Wylie ISD (Wylie)—RF Hartman Elementary School
  • Ysleta ISD—Valle Verde Early College High School

The Blue Ribbon School program recognizes public and private schools where students perform at high levels.

October 2, 2017

Legislative Sessions Offer Little Relief for Public Schools

Public schools and property taxpayers saw little legislative relief following this year’s regular and special sessions of the Texas Legislature. The story was different for charter schools.

Center for Public Policy Priorities Policy Analyst Chandra Villanueva said, “At the end of the day, large urban districts and large suburban districts get pretty much zero [additional] dollars. Charter schools are the big, big winners in all of this and a handful of very rural areas.” The Legislature increased state aid for charter schools by $1.46 billion.

Read “Experts: School funding woes largely unchanged during latest lege session” by Anna Dembowski in the Community Impact newspaper.

September 29, 2017

FOTPS: On School Choice, Property Taxes, and Politics

Friends of Texas Public Schools (FOTPS) recently published an editorial taking on the Texas Legislature for its refusal to fund public schools at the same time it pushes school privatization.

Scott Milder, FOTPS founder, said that those pushing for public funds for private schools don’t want to pay taxes to fund public schools because their children attend private schools. Also, when privatizers see the money invested annually in public schools, they see profits that could be made by getting rid of them. “I am convinced the intent is even more devious than that; underfunding our schools makes it more difficult for them to succeed, which fuels the privatization argument,” Milder writes.

The property tax implications of this failure to provide funding that keeps up with student growth and inflation is obvious: local schools have to raise property taxes to keep public schools running. Even those districts fortunate enough to be in areas with rising property values don’t get the benefit of the additional funds. “When local property values rise…the state reduces its contribution to your school district by the exact same dollar amount, thereby reducing the state’s share and increasing the local taxpayers’ burden,” Milder writes.

Read “A Peek Behind the Curtain of Political Rhetoric on School Choice, School Funding, and Local Property Taxes” on the FOTPS website.

September 25, 2017

Waco Chamber: Stop Shifting Funding Burden to Schools

An editorial in the Waco Tribune points out that for Texas’ future economic growth and vitality, our broken property tax system must be addressed. That starts with fixing the state’s method of funding public education.

The editorial notes that per-pupil state funding for education is less every year, with current spending levels below prerecession levels of 2008 before accounting for inflation. “Adjusted for inflation, in 2015 dollars, Texas was spending $10,260 per student in 2009–2010. Today we spend just $8,935,” the editorial points out. That puts Texas at 43rd in the nation in per-pupil spending on education.

With state funding for public education decreasing from around 45 percent to 36 percent in the coming biennium, school districts have to make up the difference by raising local property taxes.

Read “State deserves some blame for ire over rising property values, tax rates,” by Jessica Attas, director of public policy for the Greater Waco Chamber of Commerce.

September 22, 2017

Legislature shifts funding burden to property taxpayers

Another session (and special session) of the Texas Legislature closed with little funding relief for school districts and property taxpayers.

“It’s extremely disappointing that the Legislature couldn’t provide any real support for public education,” Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Chief Financial Officer Stuart Snow said. “Although I knew it was a long shot, I wanted to see additional significant funding for public education as well as the beginning of the restructuring of the school finance system that’s severely outdated and archaic.”

While state spending for public education has increased, it’s not keeping up with student enrollment and hasn’t for a long time. The Center for Public Policy Priorities says that the state’s share of funding for an average public school district has decreased from 46 percent in 2012 to 41 percent in 2017. That means local taxpayers are bearing more of the tax burden.

The state formula for public school funding dictates that districts with increasing property values don’t see much additional revenue. Most of it ends up in state coffers.

Read “Public school funding burden shifts to taxpayers” by Anna Dembowski and Danica Smithwick in Community Impact.

September 20, 2017

Support for charter schools in decline

The most recent annual poll by magazine Education Next indicates that the public’s support for charter schools has fallen significantly from last year. The 12 percentage-point drop brought support for charters to 39 percent and marked the biggest shift in the survey results for this year.

The decline in support for charters was about the same for Democrats and Republicans (approximately 13 percent for Republicans and 11 percent for Democrats). Support also fell among minorities (a drop of approximately 9 percent among African-Americans and 5 percent among Hispanics).

For a summary of the poll’s results, read “Charter Schools take a hit in nationwide poll” by John Fensterwald on the EdSource Website.

September 19, 2017

Study: Public Schools Offer Broadest Range of Choices

A new report from the Center for Public Education (CPE) found that public schools offer the broadest range of educational and extracurricular options. CPE is the research arm of the National School Boards Association (NSBA).

Busting the Myth of ‘one-size-fits all’ Public Education” found that public schools offer an abundance of choice in program offerings and school selection. “Extraordinary activities and approaches occur in public schools every day because school boards and school leaders continually devise and employ innovative approaches to help students succeed,” said Thomas J. Gentzel, director and CEO of the NSBA.

Other key findings in the report are as follows:

  • Public high schools offer more educational opportunities, including Advanced Placement, gifted and honors classes, and distance learning opportunities. The vast majority offer access to hands-on college experience and career preparation.
  • Public schools are more likely to offer child care, tutoring, and enrichment opportunities for students. They are also much more likely to have a counselor available to students.
  • Most public school students have the option to transfer to other schools in their district or a neighboring district.

September 18, 2017

Vouchers Won’t Solve America’s Education Problems

David Osborne, author of the book Reinventing America’s Schools: Creating a 21st Century Education System, believes that the school choice maneuvers being pushed at the national level will only reduce equality and opportunity.

“We need more equal opportunity and equality in this society, not less,” Osborne said. “And the education system is already pretty stratified. It would make it worse, not better. On top of that, private schools are not accountable for kids’ learning. There’s nobody who can close a private school.”

Read “Vouchers Aren’t the Answer to Solving America’s Education Problems, Says Author of ‘Reinventing American’s Schools’” on the74million.

September 13, 2017